Shoes and Fashion Magazine

Comments on 'Traps in the Englund Gambit (1.d4 e5?!)'

Back

Next

sverio12345 (January 8th, 2009 @ 5:52 pm)
nice one
kenyudbzto (December 7th, 2008 @ 12:34 am)
lol that's smarter. But, the problem with that is that he can force your queen away pretty easily and you don't wanna risk losing tempo so early. Besides, safely developing a bishop is a good idea early on.
Kestis05 (December 4th, 2008 @ 4:15 pm)
sry queen to d5
slaviKn17 (December 3rd, 2008 @ 5:23 am)
anybody live in NJ around essex county
slaviKn17 (December 3rd, 2008 @ 5:04 am)
d4 e5 dxe5 d6 exd6 cxd6
slaviKn17 (December 3rd, 2008 @ 5:03 am)
im startin to take chess seriously i just thought about playin e5 to d4 along with usin the nimzo indian and kings indian defense also
kenyudbzto (December 3rd, 2008 @ 3:58 am)
And since Youtube seems to be weird now and is not putting replies by the thing they're replied to, the first post was to Kestis and the second was to peterhui.
kenyudbzto (December 3rd, 2008 @ 3:57 am)
That's possible, but developmentally not too great for Black. After that, he could take and let you develop just your Queen, or he could do Nf3 to defend the pawn and develop the Knight.
kenyudbzto (December 3rd, 2008 @ 3:54 am)
Um... if you're asking why White doesn't do that, then it's because the Knight on C6 will take. Even though your Knight will take back, you just traded a Queen for a Knight, which obviously is not good.
ISSDUC (November 30th, 2008 @ 10:31 am)
nice video ;-) but I don't meet many players who play the Englund Gambit :(
peterhui50 (November 29th, 2008 @ 4:00 am)
why not offer another pawn up with 1 d4 e5 2. dxe5 f6?!
KLTolliver (November 25th, 2008 @ 12:57 am)
I thought this was called the Budapest opening?

Next